From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Peery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 14, 2017
NO. CV 16-6033-SJO(E) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2017)

Opinion

NO. CV 16-6033-SJO(E)

04-14-2017

ALEX D. JACKSON, Petitioner, v. (WARDEN) SUZANNE M. PEERY, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which any objections have been made. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the Petition without prejudice. /// ///

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein on Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

DATED: April 14, 2017.

/s/_________

S. JAMES OTERO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jackson v. Peery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 14, 2017
NO. CV 16-6033-SJO(E) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2017)
Case details for

Jackson v. Peery

Case Details

Full title:ALEX D. JACKSON, Petitioner, v. (WARDEN) SUZANNE M. PEERY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 14, 2017

Citations

NO. CV 16-6033-SJO(E) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2017)