From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Oties

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Sep 26, 2019
Case No.: 2:18-cv-00735-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Sep. 26, 2019)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:18-cv-00735-APG-BNW

09-26-2019

TREA ANDERSON JACKSON, Plaintiff v. DALE OTIES, et al., Defendants


Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case

[ECF No. 6]

On September 6, 2019, Magistrate Judge Weksler recommended that I dismiss this case without prejudice because plaintiff Trea Jackson failed to update her address and did not respond to court orders. ECF No. 6. Jackson did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made"); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise" (emphasis in original)).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Weksler's report and recommendation (ECF No. 6) is accepted and plaintiff Trea Jackson's complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.

DATED this 26th day of September, 2019.

/s/_________

ANDREW P. GORDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Jackson v. Oties

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Sep 26, 2019
Case No.: 2:18-cv-00735-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Sep. 26, 2019)
Case details for

Jackson v. Oties

Case Details

Full title:TREA ANDERSON JACKSON, Plaintiff v. DALE OTIES, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Sep 26, 2019

Citations

Case No.: 2:18-cv-00735-APG-BNW (D. Nev. Sep. 26, 2019)