Opinion
No. 07-15987.
This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed October 10, 2007.
Kenny Jackson, San Mateo, CA, pro se.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Claudia Wilken, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-98-03220-CW.
Before: B. FLETCHER, BERZON and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
We have reviewed the responses to the court's August 23, 2007 order to show cause, the record, and the opening brief. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion to reopen. See School Dist. No. U Multnomah County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's order because the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).