From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Mullen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1948
274 App. Div. 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Opinion

October 18, 1948.


In an action in equity to compel an accounting, judgment which dismissed the complaint at the close of plaintiffs' case, without prejudice to instituting an action at law, reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event. In our opinion appellants are entitled to an accounting in equity upon satisfactory proof that the individual respondent, the sole owner of the corporate capital stock, subject of the agreement between the parties, and in charge and control of the corporations' books, accounts and business, withheld proper entries in such books or by other means prevented the corporate records from portraying the full amount of profit made by the corporations. ( Fur Wool Trading Co. v. Fox, Inc., 245 N.Y. 215; Rhodes v. Little Falls Dairy Co., 230 App. Div. 571, affd. 256 N.Y. 559; Newton v. Porter, 69 N.Y. 133. ) Johnston, Acting P.J., Adel, Nolan, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Mullen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 18, 1948
274 App. Div. 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)
Case details for

Jackson v. Mullen

Case Details

Full title:ELMER JACKSON et al., Appellants, v. HARRY A. MULLEN et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 18, 1948

Citations

274 App. Div. 900 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Citing Cases

Kaminsky v. Kahn

Irrespective of the possible advantages obtained by Spear Company as a result of the transaction, this was an…