From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Mark W. Stiles Unit

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Nov 15, 2012
NO. 09-12-00487-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 15, 2012)

Opinion

NO. 09-12-00487-CV

11-15-2012

REIDIE JAMES JACKSON, Appellant v. MARK W. STILES UNIT, et al., Appellees


On Appeal from the 172nd District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. E-189,936


MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 25, 2012, we notified the parties that the notice of appeal did not appear to have been timely filed. The appellant filed a response but failed to establish that a notice of appeal was timely filed to allow either a regular or a restricted appeal. The trial court signed the judgment on January 6, 2012, and the appellate timetables were not extended by the timely filing of a post-judgment motion to reinstate. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1. Notice of appeal was due to be filed on or before February 6, 2012. Id. Appellant filed the notice of appeal on October 17, 2012, more than thirty days from the date of judgment and outside the time for which we may grant an extension of time to perfect appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. Accordingly, we must dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

____________________

CHARLES KREGER

Justice
Before Gaultney, Kreger, and Horton, JJ.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Mark W. Stiles Unit

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Nov 15, 2012
NO. 09-12-00487-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Jackson v. Mark W. Stiles Unit

Case Details

Full title:REIDIE JAMES JACKSON, Appellant v. MARK W. STILES UNIT, et al., Appellees

Court:Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

Date published: Nov 15, 2012

Citations

NO. 09-12-00487-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 15, 2012)