The standard of review on petition for writ of prohibition is that the trial court's legal findings are reviewed de novo, and the trial court's factual findings are reviewed for competent, substantial evidence. Jackson v. Leon Cty., Elections Canvassing Bd., 214 So.3d 705, 707 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016); Little v. State, 111 So.3d 214, 217 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013).

Carr has been relied on in cases where the petitioner delayed filing a prohibition petition to challenge an order denying a motion to disqualify the lower court judge and has been cited in support of the general "timeliness rule" in such cases, which holds that a petitioner must act "as soon as practicable." Jackson v. Leon Cnty. Elections Canvassing Bd., 214 So.3d 705, 706 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) (quoting People Against Tax Revenue Mismanagement, Inc. v. Reynolds, 571 So.2d 493, 496 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)). More recently, in Lewis, the Second District expressed concern about the lack of any time limitation for a prohibition petition challenging an order denying self-defense immunity.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied without prejudice. See Jackson v. Leon Ctv. Elections Canvassing Bd., 214 So. 3d 705, 706 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016) ; Alma's Italian & Seafood Rest, v. Jones, 627 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993). NORTHCUTT, CASANUEVA, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.