From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Johnson

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Jun 27, 2005
No. 3-05-CV-1230-H (N.D. Tex. Jun. 27, 2005)

Summary

finding that plaintiff's lawsuit should be dismissed as frivolous where plaintiff alleged FBI conspired with state and local police to invade plaintiff's privacy through highly sophisticated surveillance techniques, computerized mind control, and satellite weaponry

Summary of this case from Day v. Herndez

Opinion

No. 3-05-CV-1230-H.

June 27, 2005


ORDER PERMITTING PROCEEDING IN THE DISTRICT COURT AND SPECIFYING FURTHER ACTION TO BE TAKEN BY THE CLERK


Pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915, permission is hereby granted for the above named plaintiff(s) to proceed in forma pauperis in this Court until judgment is entered herein.

The Clerk of the Court shall take the following indicated action:

(X) A true copy of this order shall be mailed to each plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney of record. No further process shall issue except upon further order of the Court.

() A true copy of this order shall be mailed to each plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney of record and summons shall issue to the following defendants:

It is further ORDERED that, at all times during the pendency of this action, plaintiff(s) shall immediately notify the Court of any change of address and its effective date. Such notice shall be captioned "NOTICE TO THE COURT OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS." The notice shall contain only information pertaining to the change of address and its effective date. Failure to file a NOTICE TO THE COURT OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS may result in the dismissal of the complaint for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

After docketing, this action shall be:

(X) Referred to Magistrate Judge Kaplan for further proceedings and/or findings and recommendation.

() Referred to a Judge of the District Court for further action as may be appropriate.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Johnson

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Jun 27, 2005
No. 3-05-CV-1230-H (N.D. Tex. Jun. 27, 2005)

finding that plaintiff's lawsuit should be dismissed as frivolous where plaintiff alleged FBI conspired with state and local police to invade plaintiff's privacy through highly sophisticated surveillance techniques, computerized mind control, and satellite weaponry

Summary of this case from Day v. Herndez
Case details for

Jackson v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:WILLIE HERMAN JACKSON, SR., Plaintiff, v. J.C. JOHNSON, ET AL., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Jun 27, 2005

Citations

No. 3-05-CV-1230-H (N.D. Tex. Jun. 27, 2005)

Citing Cases

Starrett v. Lockeed Martin Corp.

See e.g. Mason v. AT & T Servs., Inc., 2014 WL 804019, at *2 (N.D. Tex. Feb. 28, 2014) (Fitzwater, J.)…

Sims v. Chatham-Sims

less because they are fanciful, fantastic, or delusional." Starrett v. Lockeed Martin Corp., 2018 WL 1399177,…