Jackson v. Jackson

Full title: DAVID JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. VERA JACKSON, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Mar 2, 2006

Civil Action No. 05-cv-02033-WYD-CBS (D. Colo. Mar. 2, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-cv-02033-WYD-CBS.

March 2, 2006

AMENDED ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED ON APPEAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915 AND FED. R. APP. P. 24

WILEY DANIEL, District Judge

Plaintiff filed pro se on February 6, 2006, a notice of appeal. On February 8, 2006, the court ordered plaintiff to cure the deficiencies on appeal by submitting either the filing fee on appeal or a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed.R.App.P. 24. On February 17, 2006, plaintiff submitted a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed.R.App.P. 24. The court has examined the motion and the file and finds that the motion is deficient for the following reasons:

(A) Filing Fee

X is not submitted

(B) Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed.R.App.P. 24 :

___ is not submitted

___ is missing affidavit

X is missing certified copy of prisoner's trust fund statement for the 6-month period immediately preceding this filing

___ is missing required financial information

___ is missing an original signature by the prisoner

___ is not on proper form (must use the court's current form)

___ other ________________________

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the February 17, 2006 motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied because the motion is deficient.