From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Jackson

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jun 9, 2009
335 F. App'x 14 (11th Cir. 2009)

Summary

holding that prisoner, who was being refused surgery for his hernia, satisfied the imminent danger of serious physical injury requirement

Summary of this case from Freeman v. Collins

Opinion

No. 08-13009 Non-Argument Calendar.

June 9, 2009.

Melvin James Jackson, Folkston, GA, pro se.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia. D.C. Docket No. 08-00011-CV-5.

Before EDMONDSON, MARCUS and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.


Melvin James Jackson is a Georgia prison inmate. He sued certain prison officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for supposedly acting with deliberate indifference to-wards his serious medical needs. The district court dismissed his lawsuit under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 after the court concluded that he was not eligible to proceed in forma pauperis. We vacate the decision of the district court and remand the case.

Jackson asks us to enter a default judgement in his favor and to reconsider our earlier order denying him leave to amend his appeal papers; we reject his requests.

Section 1915 allows a prisoner to file three frivolous lawsuits at a reduced rate. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(b), (g); Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th Cir. 2002). After the third baseless complaint, however, a prisoner must pay the full filing fee. Dupree, 284 F.3d at 1236. The only exception is if the prisoner faces imminent danger of serious physical injury when he files suit. Medberry v. Butler, 185 F.3d 1189, 1193 (11th Cir. 1999). Jackson does not dispute that he has already filed three frivolous lawsuits; thus, he may proceed in forma pauperis here only if he was in imminent danger of serious harm when he filed suit.

We believe Jackson has met this standard. In his complaint, Jackson claims that he has a hernia that causes him to suffer from severe pain in his testicles and abdomen, blood in his urine, nausea, and weight loss. Jackson contends that without surgery, which the defendant prison officials will not approve, he will continue to suffer from those injuries and may even face tissue death, gangrene, and internal bleeding. Based on these allegations, which we must construe liberally, accept as true, and view as a whole, Brown v. Johnson, 387 F.3d 1344, 1350 (11th Cir. 2004), we conclude that Jackson has sufficiently demonstrated that he was in imminent danger of serious physical injury when he filed suit. Jackson may proceed with his lawsuit in forma pauperis.

In his appeal papers, Jackson indicates that he received his surgery after filing his complaint. What effect this development has on his lawsuit, if any, we save for the district court.

VACATED and REMANDED.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Jackson

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
Jun 9, 2009
335 F. App'x 14 (11th Cir. 2009)

holding that prisoner, who was being refused surgery for his hernia, satisfied the imminent danger of serious physical injury requirement

Summary of this case from Freeman v. Collins

holding that prisoner, who was being refused surgery for his hernia, satisfied the imminent danger of serious physical injury requirement

Summary of this case from Freeman v. Director Terry Collins

finding imminent danger of physical injury when plaintiff-prisoner alleged that he faced "face tissue death, gangrene, and internal bleeding" due to lack of medical attention

Summary of this case from Daker v. Dozier

finding imminent danger of physical injury when plaintiff-prisoner alleged that he faced "face tissue death, gangrene, and internal bleeding" due to lack of medical attention

Summary of this case from Daker v. Dozier

approving IFP status where “Jackson contends that without surgery, which the defendant prison officials will not approve, he will continue to suffer from those injuries and may even face tissue death, gangrene, and internal bleeding”

Summary of this case from Vandiver v. Prison Health Servs., Inc.

approving in forma pauperis status where "Jackson contends that without surgery, which the defendant prison officials will not approve, he will continue to suffer from those injuries and may even face tissue death, gangrene, and internal bleeding" (footnote omitted)

Summary of this case from Driver v. Alexander

pleading the denial of hernia surgery met the imminent-danger requirement

Summary of this case from Rollins v. Correct Care Solutions
Case details for

Jackson v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:Melvin James JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Warden Don JACKSON, Doctor…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit

Date published: Jun 9, 2009

Citations

335 F. App'x 14 (11th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Freeman v. Mohr

Specifically, Mr. Freeman notes the Sixth Circuit holding in Vandiver v. Vasbinder, 2011 WL 11055652 (6th…

Buckenberger v. La. DPS&C

III. Third Objection (Doc. 9)In this objection, Plaintiff largely repeats arguments previously made. He cites…