Jackson v. Haviland

Full title: MICHAEL JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. JOHN HAVILAND, et al., Defendants

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 21, 2011

No. CIV S-09-2911 DAD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 21, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-2911 DAD P.

April 21, 2011

ORDER

DALE DROZD, Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

On September 9, 2010, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve process upon defendant Herrera in this case. The Marshal was directed to attempt to secure a waiver of service before attempting personal service on defendant. If a waiver of service was not returned within sixty days, the Marshal was directed to effect personal service on the defendant in accordance with the provisions of Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 566(c), without prepayment of costs, and to file the return of service with evidence of any attempt to secure a waiver of service and with evidence of all costs subsequently incurred in effecting personal service.

On March 9, 2011, the United States Marshal filed a return of service with a USM-285 form showing total charges of $153.70 for effecting personal service on defendant Herrera. The form shows that a waiver of service form was mailed to the defendant on October 5, 2010, and that no response was received.

Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides, in pertinent part, as follows:

An individual, corporation, or association that is subject to service under subdivision (e), (f), or (h) and that receives notice of an action in the manner provided in this paragraph has a duty to avoid unnecessary costs of serving the summons. . . .

If a defendant located within the United States fails to comply with a request for waiver made by a plaintiff located within the United States, the court shall impose the costs subsequently incurred in effecting service on the defendant unless good cause for the failure be shown.

Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d)(2).

The court finds that defendant Herrera was given the opportunity required by Rule 4(d)(2) to waive service and has failed to comply with the request.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Within thirty days from the date of this order defendant Herrera shall pay to the United States Marshal the sum of $153.70, unless within that time defendant files a written statement showing good cause for his failure to waive service.

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the U.S. Marshal.

DATED: April 19, 2011.