From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Gambino

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Mar 13, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3983 (MLC) (D.N.J. Mar. 13, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3983 (MLC).

March 13, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION


THE PLAINTIFF — Joey Jackson — applying to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 ("Application") (dkt. entry no. 1, Application); and the Court, based upon Jackson's assertions in support thereof, intending to (1) grant the Application, and (2) direct the Clerk of the Court to file the Complaint, see Jackson v. Gambino, No. 08-2744 (FLW), dkt. entry no. 2, 6-5-08 Order (granting relief to same plaintiff); Jackson v. Gambino, No. 08-3072 (FLW), dkt. entry no. 2, 6-26-08 Order (same); and

IT APPEARING that the Court may (1) review a complaint, and (2) dismiss it sua sponte if it is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B); and it appearing that Jackson, who is pro se, lives in an assisted living facility overseen by the defendant (dkt. entry no. 1, Compl.); and it appearing that Jackson's claims herein are duplicative of claims that (1) he has already brought in two other cases in the District of New Jersey, and (2) have already been resolved, see Jackson v. Gambino, No. 08-2744 (FLW), dkt. entry no. 9, 8-21-08 Order (dismissing complaint therein); Jackson v. Gambino, No. 08-3072 (FLW), dkt. entry no. 2, 6-26-08 Order (dismissing complaint therein); id., dkt. entry no. 4, 8-21-08 Order (denying motion to reopen action); and it appearing that Jackson may not seek relief on the same claims from a different district court judge, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 60; L.Civ.R. 7.1(i); Fed.R.App.P. 3-5;Olaniyi v. Alexa Cab Co., 239 Fed.Appx. 698, 699 (3d Cir. 2007) (affirming order dismissing complaint because "to the extent [the plaintiffs] were simply seeking to challenge the decision issued by [another judge in the same district], they were required to do so by filing a motion for reconsideration in that case or seeking appellate review of the order of dismissal in th[e] Court [of Appeals]"); and

THE COURT thus intending to dismiss the Complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a claim; and for good cause appearing, the Court will issue an appropriate Order and Judgment.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Gambino

United States District Court, D. New Jersey
Mar 13, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3983 (MLC) (D.N.J. Mar. 13, 2009)
Case details for

Jackson v. Gambino

Case Details

Full title:JOEY JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. ELISE GAMBINO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. New Jersey

Date published: Mar 13, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3983 (MLC) (D.N.J. Mar. 13, 2009)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. New Jersey Div. of Developmental Disabilities

As this memorandum is being written for the parties, the complete facts of the case are not set forth fully…

Hause v. U.S.

entry no. 14); and THE COURT NOTING that under Rule 12(b)(6) a court may dismiss a complaint for "failure to…