From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Farrell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 9, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-3796 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 9, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-3796

11-09-2012

EDWARD JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN M. FARRELL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

AND NOW, this 8th day of November 2012, upon consideration of Plaintiff's pro se Complaint (Doc. No. 3) and in light of the Court's Order dated September 18, 2012 allowing Plaintiff thirty days to show cause why this matter should not be dismissed for want of prosecution (Doc. No. 8), and having received no response from Plaintiff, it is ORDERED that:

1. The above-captioned case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

2. The Clerk of Court shall close the case for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

___________________

JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Farrell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 9, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-3796 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Jackson v. Farrell

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN M. FARRELL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 9, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-3796 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 9, 2012)