Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08-CV-0234.
February 19, 2008
ORDER
AND NOW, this 19th day of February, 2008, upon consideration of pro se petitioner's motion (Doc. 4) asking the court to reconsider the order of court dated February 6, 2008 (Doc. 3), and the court finding that there are no manifest errors of law or fact in the challenged order, see Harsco Corp. v. Zlotniki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir. 1985) ("The purpose of a motion for reconsideration is to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence. . . ."), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration (Doc. 4) is DENIED.