From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Dretke

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division
Aug 3, 2006
C.A. No. C-06-019 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 3, 2006)

Opinion

C.A. No. C-06-019.

August 3, 2006


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS


On June 7, 2006, the United States Magistrate Judge filed her Memorandum and Recommendation in this cause (D.E. 10). After ample opportunity, no objections have been filed by either party. This Court regards such omission as each party's agreement with and acceptance of the Magistrate Judge's findings of fact and conclusions of law. Having reviewed the pleadings on file, the Court finds no clear error in the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation. Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). This Court adopts as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, respondent's Motion to Dismiss (D.E. 8) is granted and petitioner's cause of action for habeas corpus relief is dismissed with prejudice. In the event that petitioner seeks a certificate of appealability his request is denied.

ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Dretke

United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division
Aug 3, 2006
C.A. No. C-06-019 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 3, 2006)
Case details for

Jackson v. Dretke

Case Details

Full title:BUZZ WILLYS JACKSON, Petitioner, v. DOUG DRETKE, DIRECTOR TEXAS DEPARTMENT…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Corpus Christi Division

Date published: Aug 3, 2006

Citations

C.A. No. C-06-019 (S.D. Tex. Aug. 3, 2006)

Citing Cases

Tompkins v. Hawkins

Because Tompkins has received all of the relief she seeks in this petition-jail-time credits for the period…

Santiago v. Martin

Because the BOP administratively awarded all of the sentencing credit that Petitioner requested in his…