From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RENO, NEVADA
Aug 25, 2011
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-0771-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Aug. 25, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-0771-LRH-RAM

08-25-2011

ALFONSO JACKSON, Plaintiff(s), v. JOHN DOE, et al., Defendant(s).

Counsel for Plaintiff(s): ALFONSO JACKSON, In Pro Per (telephonically) Counsel for Defendant(s): DANIEL SLIMAK


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: HONORABLE ROBERT A. McQUAID , JR., U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Deputy Clerk: JENNIFER COTTER Reporter: FTR: 9:02:09 a.m. - 9:07:37 a.m. Counsel for Plaintiff(s): ALFONSO JACKSON, In Pro Per (telephonically) Counsel for Defendant(s): DANIEL SLIMAK

PROCEEDINGS: MOTION HEARING

9:02 a.m. Court convenes. The Court addresses Plaintiff's Motion to Exceed Copy Limit (Docket #24), and the parties present brief argument as to their respective positions. IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Exceed Copy Limit is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiff shall be allowed $50.00 in additional copy work for this case only. Plaintiff has leave to file an additional motion in the future if he feels that more copies will be necessary. 9:07 a.m. Court adjourns.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By: ____________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Jackson v. Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RENO, NEVADA
Aug 25, 2011
CASE NO. 3:10-CV-0771-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Aug. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Jackson v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:ALFONSO JACKSON, Plaintiff(s), v. JOHN DOE, et al., Defendant(s).

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RENO, NEVADA

Date published: Aug 25, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 3:10-CV-0771-LRH-RAM (D. Nev. Aug. 25, 2011)