Jackson v. Director of CDC

Full title: Freddie B. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF CDC…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 23, 2001

14 F. App'x 924 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

14 Fed.Appx. 924 (9th Cir. 2001) Freddie B. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DIRECTOR OF CDC, Defendant-Appellee. No. 01-15618. D.C. No. CV-00-02730-DFL. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. July 23, 2001

Submitted July 9, 2001. ^*

* The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, we deny Jackson's request for oral argument.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California David F. Levi, District Judge, Presiding.

Before KOZINSKI, T.G. NELSON, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ^**

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Freddie B. Jackson appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action because he failed to inform the court of an address change as required under Local Rule 83-182(d). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review

Page 925.

the district court's dismissal pursuant to its local rules for abuse of discretion, and we affirm. See Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir.1995) (per curiam).

Because this case does not present exceptional circumstances on appeal, we deny Jackson's request for appointment of counsel. See Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir.1991).

AFFIRMED.