From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Corcoran

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Jul 6, 2010
10-CV-6262P, 10-CV-6298P, 10-CV-6314P (W.D.N.Y. Jul. 6, 2010)

Opinion

10-CV-6262P, 10-CV-6298P, 10-CV-6314P.

July 6, 2010


DECISION AND ORDER


Plaintiff, Carl Jackson, an inmate of the Sullivan Correctional Facility when he filed these actions, has filed these three pro se action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It now appears that the Court does not have plaintiff's current address. Plaintiff was released from Sullivan Correctional Facility on June 17, 2010. Based on this, it appears that plaintiff has failed to provide the Court with an address where papers may be served.

Local Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(d) requires that a party proceeding pro se "must furnish the Court with a current address at which papers may be served on the litigant. . . . . In addition, the Court must have a current address at all times. Thus a pro se litigant must notify the Court immediately in writing of any change of address. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of the case with prejudice." Local Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(d).

Accordingly, plaintiff is directed to provide the Court with an address where papers may be served by August 3, 2010 or the cases will be dismissed with prejudice without further order of the Court.

If plaintiff fails to provide an address by August 3, 2010, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this cases as dismissed with prejudice without further order of the Court.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Corcoran

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Jul 6, 2010
10-CV-6262P, 10-CV-6298P, 10-CV-6314P (W.D.N.Y. Jul. 6, 2010)
Case details for

Jackson v. Corcoran

Case Details

Full title:CARL JACKSON, 90B1304, Plaintiff, v. P. CORCORAN, et al., Defendants. CARL…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Jul 6, 2010

Citations

10-CV-6262P, 10-CV-6298P, 10-CV-6314P (W.D.N.Y. Jul. 6, 2010)