From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

O'dell v. Kozee

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 2011
28 A.3d 343 (Conn. 2011)

Opinion

2011-09-20

John A. O'DELL, Administrator (Estate of Patrick O'Dell)v.Kenneth KOZEE et al.


Ron Murphy, New Britain, in support of the petition.Elycia D. Solimene, Middletown, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 128 Conn.App. 794, 19 A.3d 672, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that General Statutes § 30–102 requires visible proof of intoxication?

“2. If the answer to question one is affirmative, did the Appellate Court properly determine that the case should be remanded and dismissed when the trial court has issued a ruling prior to trial that the plaintiff did not have to prove visible intoxication?”


Summaries of

O'dell v. Kozee

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Sep 20, 2011
28 A.3d 343 (Conn. 2011)
Case details for

O'dell v. Kozee

Case Details

Full title:John A. O'DELL, Administrator (Estate of Patrick O'Dell)v.Kenneth KOZEE et…

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Sep 20, 2011

Citations

28 A.3d 343 (Conn. 2011)
302 Conn. 928