Jackson v. Comm. on Judicial Performance

Full title: JULIUS LEE JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. COMM. ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE, et al.…

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 13, 2005

No. CIV S-05-0296 GEB GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 13, 2005)

Opinion

No. CIV S-05-0296 GEB GGH P.

October 13, 2005

FINDINGS RECOMMENDATIONS

GREGORY HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge

By order filed April 1, 2005, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. On April 21, 2005, plaintiff filed an interlocutory appeal which was denied on July 15, 2005. To date, plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 11-110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).