From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. BLST Holding Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 28, 2022
22-CV-4321 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-4321 (RA)

07-28-2022

SYLINIA JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. BLST HOLDING COMPANY LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

RONNIE ABRAMS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE:

It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled in principle. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within forty-five (45) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within forty-five (45) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same 45-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jackson v. BLST Holding Co.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Jul 28, 2022
22-CV-4321 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Jackson v. BLST Holding Co.

Case Details

Full title:SYLINIA JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. BLST HOLDING COMPANY LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Jul 28, 2022

Citations

22-CV-4321 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 28, 2022)