From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Bell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 16, 2011
2:00-CV-00104-PMP-LRL (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2011)

Opinion

2:00-CV-00104-PMP-LRL

08-16-2011

RALPH FOSTER JACKSON, JR., Plaintiff, v. STEWART BELL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

On November 16, 2000 the Court entered an Order (Doc. #10) dismissing Plaintiff's Amended Civil Rights Complaint (Doc. #9) brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983.

Nearly 2 ½ years later, on February 28, 2003, the Court entered an Order (Doc. #13) denying Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. #12).

Now, nearly 11 years after Plaintiff's Amended Complaint was dismissed, Plaintiff Jackson files his latest Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. #15). Plaintiff's Complaint is obviously time barred, and moreover, raises issues which, if cognizable at all, would have been more properly considered through an action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §2254. Regardless, the Court finds no basis to reconsider its Order (Doc. #10) entered 11 years ago.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Jackson's Motion for Reconsideration "Second Request" is DENIED.

PHILIP M. PRO

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Jackson v. Bell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 16, 2011
2:00-CV-00104-PMP-LRL (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Jackson v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:RALPH FOSTER JACKSON, JR., Plaintiff, v. STEWART BELL, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 16, 2011

Citations

2:00-CV-00104-PMP-LRL (D. Nev. Aug. 16, 2011)