From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Bay Area Rapid Transit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2011
No. C 11-3355 SI (pr) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 11-3355 SI (pr)

10-24-2011

CLARENCE JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT; et al., Defendants.


ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE

FOR AMENDED COMPLAINT AND

PAUPER APPLICATION

Clarence Jackson filed a pro se civil action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court cannot understand Jackson's claims because the complaint is devoid of any information about Jackson's factual allegations, claims or requested relief. The handwritten pleading simply states the names of the defendants and refers to attached sheets for the statement of the claim. There are no attachments to the complaint.

Jackson has filed a motion requesting an extension of time to file both an amended complaint and his in forma pauperis application because he was recently released from Santa Rita Jail. Upon due consideration, the court GRANTS Jackson's motion. (Docket # 5.)

Jackson must file his amended complaint and in forma pauperis application no later than November 11, 2011. Failure to file the amended complaint and in forma pauperis application by the deadline will result in dismissal of this action. No further extension of this deadline will be granted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SUSAN ILLSTON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Jackson v. Bay Area Rapid Transit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2011
No. C 11-3355 SI (pr) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Jackson v. Bay Area Rapid Transit

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT; et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Citations

No. C 11-3355 SI (pr) (N.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)