From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Bank of Am. (In re Bank of Am. Wage & Hour Emp't Practices Litig.)

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Sep 26, 2012
D. Nevada C.A. No. 2:11-02117 (D. Nev. Sep. 26, 2012)

Opinion

D. Nevada C.A. No. 2:11-02117 MDL No. 2138

09-26-2012

In re: BANK OF AMERICA WAGE AND HOUR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION Nichole Jackson v. Bank of America


CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-17)

AND SIMULTANEOUS SEPARATION AND REMAND OF CERTAIN CLAIMS

On April 14, 2010, the Panel transferred ten civil actions to the United States District Court for the District of Kansas for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 706 F.Supp.2d 1369 (J.P.M.L. 2010). Since that time, 17 additional actions have been transferred to the District of Kansas. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable John W. Lungstrum. It appears that the action on this conditional transfer order comprises claims relating to: (1) allegations that Bank of America requires its employees to reduce the amount of time worked on their time sheets and fails to pay its employees for time worked, which involve questions of fact that are common to the previously transferred MDL No. 2138 actions; and (2) other allegations that do not relate to the failure to pay for time worked and which do not involve such common questions of fact. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, this action is transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of Kansas for the reasons stated in the order of April 14, 2010, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable John W. Lungstrum. The First, Second, Third, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth claims for relief, which do not relate to the failure to pay for time worked, are hereby separated and simultaneously remanded, under 28 U.S.C. § 1407(a), to the District of Nevada. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:

_______________

Jeffery N. Lüthi

Clerk of the Panel


Summaries of

Jackson v. Bank of Am. (In re Bank of Am. Wage & Hour Emp't Practices Litig.)

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
Sep 26, 2012
D. Nevada C.A. No. 2:11-02117 (D. Nev. Sep. 26, 2012)
Case details for

Jackson v. Bank of Am. (In re Bank of Am. Wage & Hour Emp't Practices Litig.)

Case Details

Full title:In re: BANK OF AMERICA WAGE AND HOUR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION…

Court:UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

Date published: Sep 26, 2012

Citations

D. Nevada C.A. No. 2:11-02117 (D. Nev. Sep. 26, 2012)