From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Armstrong

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Aug 20, 2008
Case Number: 1:05cv798 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 20, 2008)

Summary

denying summary judgment to corrections officer accused of using his PR 24 on arm of inmate who refused to remove his arm from food hatch, even though only pain and mild redness without swelling noted on Plaintiff's arm

Summary of this case from Spencer v. ODRC Dir. Ernie Moore

Opinion

Case Number: 1:05cv798.

August 20, 2008


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy S. Hogan filed on May 29, 2008 (Doc. 37), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired August 11, 2008, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, Defendant Armstrong's motion for summary judgement is GRANTED and Defendant Bianco's motion for summary judgment is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Armstrong

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division
Aug 20, 2008
Case Number: 1:05cv798 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 20, 2008)

denying summary judgment to corrections officer accused of using his PR 24 on arm of inmate who refused to remove his arm from food hatch, even though only pain and mild redness without swelling noted on Plaintiff's arm

Summary of this case from Spencer v. ODRC Dir. Ernie Moore
Case details for

Jackson v. Armstrong

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN JACKSON, Plaintiff(s), v. SERGEANT ARMSTRONG, Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division

Date published: Aug 20, 2008

Citations

Case Number: 1:05cv798 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 20, 2008)

Citing Cases

Spencer v. ODRC Dir. Ernie Moore

Therefore, Defendants Tackett and Maynard cannot be granted qualified immunity at this point. Accord Kinzer…