From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Armel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 16, 2018
Civil Action No. 17-1237 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 16, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 17-1237

01-16-2018

CHARLES JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. ERIC R. ARMEL, et.al., Defendants.



Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly MEMORANDUM ORDER

Magistrate Judge Kelly's Order denying Plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel dated January 2, 2018 (see Doc. 15) was neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. See generally Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) (reciting standards of review governing magistrate judges' non-dispositive rulings). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Appeal (Doc. 16) is DENIED, and Judge Kelly's ruling is AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. January 16, 2018

s/Cathy Bissoon

Cathy Bissoon

United States District Judge cc (via ECF email notification): All counsel of record cc (via First-Class U.S. Mail): CHARLES JACKSON
KY-5535
SCI Somerset
1600 Walters Mill Road
Somerset, PA 15510


Summaries of

Jackson v. Armel

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 16, 2018
Civil Action No. 17-1237 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 16, 2018)
Case details for

Jackson v. Armel

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES JACKSON, Plaintiff, v. ERIC R. ARMEL, et.al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 16, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 17-1237 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 16, 2018)