Opinion
CIV. NO. 3:07CV0471 (JCH).
May 5, 2008
RULING ON DISCOVERY ISSUE
In reviewing the approximately 700 pages recovered pursuant to the plaintiff's first subpoena, the CLC identified several documents that mention the plaintiff but that were not within the scope of the subpoena. The Court has reviewed these documents (bates stamped CLC 00057 — 00074) and orders the following documents to be produced.
1. Bates stamped Doc. #CLC 00058
2. Bates stamped Doc. #CLC 00059
3. Bates stamped Doc. #CLC 00060
4. Bates stamped Doc. #CLC 00061
5. Bates stamped Doc. #CLC 00062
6. Bates stamped Doc. #CLC 00063
7. Bates stamped Doc. #CLC 00064
8. Bates stamped Doc. #CLC 00065
9. Bates stamped Doc. #CLC 00066
10. Bates stamped Doc. #CLC 00067
11. Bates stamped Doc. #CLC 00068
12. Bates stamped Doc. #CLC 00070
13. Bates stamped Doc. #CLC 00071
14. Bates stamped Doc. #CLC 00072
15. Bates stamped Doc. #CLC 00073
16. Bates stamped Doc. #CLC 00074
This is not a recommended ruling. This is a discovery ruling and order which is reviewable pursuant to the "clearly erroneous" statutory standard of review. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(a), 6(e) and 72(a); and Rule 2 of the Local Rules for United States Magistrate Judges. As such, it is an order of the Court unless reversed or modified by the district judge upon motion timely made.