From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackmon v. America's Servicing Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 14, 2011
Case No. C 11-03884 CRB (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. C 11-03884 CRB

11-14-2011

AMIRA JACKMON, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. AMERICA'S SERVICING COMPANY and WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendants.

By Peter Fredman For Plaintiff AMIRA JACKMON WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., By its attorneys, Irene C. Freidel Matthew G. Ball Megan F. Cesare-Eastman Irene C. Freidel (pro hac vice) David D. Christensen (pro hac vice)


Steve W. Berman (Pro Hac Vice)

Thomas E. Loeser (Cal. Bar No. 202724)

HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP

Peter B. Fredman (Cal. Bar No. 189097)

LAW OFFICE OF PETER FREDMAN

Attorney for Plaintiff AMIRA JACKMON,

for herself and persons similarly situated

CLASS ACTION

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON

MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Recitals

WHEREAS,

1. On August 8, 2011, Plaintiff filed her complaint in pro se.

2. On September 23, 2011, new counsel for Plaintiff appeared and filed a First Amended Complaint, including class allegations.

3. On October 18, 2011, new counsel for Defendant appeared.

4. On October 19, 2011, the parties stipulated that (a) Defendant would have until November 2, 2011 to respond to the FAC by filing a motion to dismiss; and (b) Plaintiff would have a minimum of 30 days to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss.

5. Defendant filed the stipulation (as Doc # 46) pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a) with respect to the extension of response time, but did not seek an order regarding the extended briefing schedule.

6. On November 2, 2011, Defendant filed the motion to dismiss. Hearing was set for January 6, 2012.

Stipulation

THEREFORE,

The parties hereby stipulate that

A. Plaintiff shall have until December 5, 2011 to oppose the motion to dismiss; and
B. Defendant shall have until December 19, 2011 to reply to the opposition.

IT IS SO STIPULATED

LAW OFFICE OF PETER FREDMAN

By Peter Fredman

For Plaintiff AMIRA JACKMON

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,

By its attorneys,

Irene C. Freidel

Matthew G. Ball

Megan F. Cesare-Eastman

Irene C. Freidel (pro hac vice)

David D. Christensen (pro hac vice)
I, PETER FREDMAN, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this document, and in compliance with General Order No. 45, X.B., hereby attest that all signatories concur with this filing. /s/Peter Fredman

ORDER

Pursuant to this stipulation and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS SO ORDERED.

A. Plaintiff shall have until December 5, 2011 to oppose the motion to dismiss; and
B. Defendant shall have until December 12, 2011 to reply to the opposition.

Judge Charles R. Breyer


Summaries of

Jackmon v. America's Servicing Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 14, 2011
Case No. C 11-03884 CRB (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Jackmon v. America's Servicing Co.

Case Details

Full title:AMIRA JACKMON, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 14, 2011

Citations

Case No. C 11-03884 CRB (N.D. Cal. Nov. 14, 2011)