From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jack v. Dawson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 3, 2010
364 F. App'x 3 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-1628.

Submitted: January 20, 2010.

Decided: February 3, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (5:09-cv-00032-gec).

Todd M. Jack, Appellant Pro Se.

Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Todd M. Jack appeals the district court's order dismissing this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jack v. Dawson, No. 5:09-cv-00032-gec, 2009 WL 1451644 (W.D.Va. May 20, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Jack v. Dawson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 3, 2010
364 F. App'x 3 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Jack v. Dawson

Case Details

Full title:Todd M. JACK, MS, PhD, Trustee, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. President Cutler…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 3, 2010

Citations

364 F. App'x 3 (4th Cir. 2010)