From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jack v. Chapman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Oct 5, 2016
Civil Action No. 3:16CV316 (E.D. Va. Oct. 5, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:16CV316

10-05-2016

JAMES L. JACK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL L. CHAPMAN, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

By Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on September 15, 2016, the Court dismissed without prejudice James L. Jack's civil action because he failed to pay the initial partial filing fee and failed to aver that he could not pay such a fee. Later that day, the Court received a response from Jack wherein he indicated that he had been transferred and only received the Court's August 17, 2016 Memorandum Order directing him to pay the initial partial filing fee on August 29, 2016. (Resp. 1, ECF No. 9.) In that letter, Jack also indicates that he lacks sufficient funds to pay the initial partial filing fee. (Id.) In light of Jack's response and his interest in continuing to prosecute the action, the Court will vacate the September 15, 2016 Memorandum Opinion and Order. The Court will continue to process the action.

The Clerk is directed to send a copy of the Memorandum Opinion to Jack.

It is so ORDERED.

/s/_________

Robert E. Payne

Senior United States District Judge Date: October 5, 2016
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Jack v. Chapman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Oct 5, 2016
Civil Action No. 3:16CV316 (E.D. Va. Oct. 5, 2016)
Case details for

Jack v. Chapman

Case Details

Full title:JAMES L. JACK, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL L. CHAPMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Oct 5, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:16CV316 (E.D. Va. Oct. 5, 2016)