From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jack Sweet v. Woods

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 12, 2009
60 A.D.3d 1183 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)

Opinion

No. 505365.

March 12, 2009.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Jack Sweet, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Peters, J.P., Rose, Lahtinen, Kavanagh and McCarthy, JJ.


After an incident arising out of petitioner's insistence that there was a problem with his food, he was charged in a misbehavior report with refusing a direct order, making threats and creating a disturbance. At the conclusion of the ensuing tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of all charges. That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal, prompting this CPLR article 78 proceeding.

We confirm. The determination of guilt is supported by substantial evidence in the form of the misbehavior report and videotape depicting the incident in question ( see Matter of McEachin v Napoli, 56 AD3d 1089, 1089). Petitioner's assertion that the Hearing Officer was biased is neither substantiated by the record nor is there any indication that the determination in issue flowed from any purported bias (see Matter of Randolph v Napoli, 56 AD3d 832, 833). We have examined petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that he was denied adequate employee assistance and was deprived of the right to present witness testimony, and find them to be unavailing.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Jack Sweet v. Woods

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 12, 2009
60 A.D.3d 1183 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
Case details for

Jack Sweet v. Woods

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of JACK SWEET, Petitioner, v. R. WOODS, as Superintendent of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 12, 2009

Citations

60 A.D.3d 1183 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)
2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 1752
873 N.Y.S.2d 921

Citing Cases

Matter of Bolanos v. Fischer

There is nothing in the record to support petitioner's contention that the Hearing Officer was biased, or…

In re Yaseen Wahhab

The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of its author, provide substantial evidence supporting…