From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jack & Jill Togs, Inc. v. Bernside Mills, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 1956
2 A.D.2d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Opinion

November 30, 1956 Republished


Upon the record before us the plaintiff has not made a satisfactory showing of irreparable damage such as would warrant granting the drastic relief of temporary injunction. To grant it may result in such damage to the defendant that even a determination in its favor after trial would not remedy. Defendant has stated in open court that it would withdraw the pending motion addressed to the complaint and join issue immediately. Both parties have stated they are prepared to go to trial at once. Order unanimously reversed and the motion for a temporary injunction denied. Settle order on notice in which provision is made for the withdrawal of the motion addressed to the complaint, and the dates for joinder of issue and for trial fixed.

Concur — Botein, J.P., Rabin, Frank, Valente and Bergan, JJ.


Summaries of

Jack & Jill Togs, Inc. v. Bernside Mills, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 1956
2 A.D.2d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)
Case details for

Jack & Jill Togs, Inc. v. Bernside Mills, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:JACK JILL TOGS, INC., Respondent, v. BERNSIDE MILLS, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1956

Citations

2 A.D.2d 887 (N.Y. App. Div. 1956)

Citing Cases

Meadow Brook National Bank v. Meadowbrook Securities, Inc.

The prayer of the complaint seeks to permanently restrain defendant from using the name "Meadow Brook". The…

Mead Johnson Co. v. Carlton Drug

The chronology of the controversy and of its submission to the court for resolution alone is, in my mind, the…