From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacinto v. Casey

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Sep 9, 1975
115 R.I. 914 (R.I. 1975)

Opinion

M. P. No. 75-249.

September 9, 1975.

It appearing from the record that the trial justice in issuing a preliminary injunction against the defendants apparently failed to comply with the mandate of Super. R. Civ. P. 65(a), and thereby denied the defendants an effective opportunity to present relevant evidence, the defendants' motion for a stay pending appeal is granted. Marshall Durbin Farms, Inc. v. National Farmers Organization, Inc., 446 F.2d 353 (5th Cir. 1971); Sims v. Greene, 161 F.2d 87 (3d Cir. 1947); 1 Kent, R.I. Civ. Prac. 65.3 (1969).

Manning, West, Santaniello Pari, V. James Santaniello, for plaintiffs.

Natale L. Urso, for defendants.


Summaries of

Jacinto v. Casey

Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Sep 9, 1975
115 R.I. 914 (R.I. 1975)
Case details for

Jacinto v. Casey

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH L. JACINTO et al. v. JOHN M. CASEY et al

Court:Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Date published: Sep 9, 1975

Citations

115 R.I. 914 (R.I. 1975)