From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jaber v. Ray

United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia
Apr 22, 2024
Civil Action 5:24-CV-25 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 22, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 5:24-CV-25

04-22-2024

FAOUZI JABER, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN RAY, ACTING WARDEN BROWN,OFFICER TITLLE, OFFICER BROWN, OFFICER POLLS, OFFICER G. COPELL, OFFICER D. MILLER, OFFICER CHEAPLEY, LIEUTENANT CIVIC, T. KEENER, R.N., DR. ADAMS, OFFICER DICK, GOMEZ, PATRICK GREAYEN, SMITH, WILLIAMS RAPHAEL, MR. McCAUL, and MR. VANKRIK, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

BAILEY, JUDGE

The above referenced case is before this Court upon the magistrate judge's recommendation that defendants Patrick Greayen and Williams Raphael be dismissed with prejudice and that the claims made against the federal employees proceed. For the reasons that follow, this Court will adopt the R&R.

This Court is charged with conducting a de novo review of any portion of the magistrate judge's report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). However, absent prompt objection by a dissatisfied party, it appears that Congress did not intend for the district court to review the factual and legal conclusions of the magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Additionally, any party who fails to file timely, written objections to the magistrate judge's report pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) waives the right to raise those objections at the appellate court level. United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91 (4th Cir. 1984), cert, denied, 467 U.S. 1208 (1984). The report and recommendation was filed on March 21,2024. See [Doc. 11]. After receiving an extension of time to file his objections, plaintiff filed his objections on April 22, 2024. However, in his objections, plaintiff states that he agrees with the magistrate judge that the claims against defendants Patrick Greayen and Williams Raphael should be dismissed and that the claims made against the federal employees may proceed. See [Doc. 17]. Thus, no objections have been filed in this case.

A de novo review of the record indicates that the magistrate judge's report accurately summarizes this case and the applicable law. Accordingly, the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [Doc. 11] is ADOPTED. The Clerk is DIRECTED TO STRIKE Patrick Greayen and Williams Raphael as defendants in this matter.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to any counsel of record herein and to send a copy to plaintiff by certified mail, return receipt requested, to his last known address as shown on the docket.


Summaries of

Jaber v. Ray

United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia
Apr 22, 2024
Civil Action 5:24-CV-25 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Jaber v. Ray

Case Details

Full title:FAOUZI JABER, Plaintiff, v. WARDEN RAY, ACTING WARDEN BROWN,OFFICER…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of West Virginia

Date published: Apr 22, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 5:24-CV-25 (N.D.W. Va. Apr. 22, 2024)