From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J. Rosen Furs, Inc. v. Sigma Plumbing & Heating Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 1998
249 A.D.2d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 6, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

On October 22, 1991, a water damage loss occurred at premises located at 180-18 Union Turnpike in Queens County. The appellant Gladys Gherardi owned the property and the plaintiffs were tenants therein. The plaintiffs contend that through a series of events, including a clogged main sewer drain, they sustained damages to fur coats stored in a basement vault of the leased premises.

The plaintiffs commenced this action against landlord Gherardi and the defendant Sigma Plumbing Heating Corp., a plumbing company hired to do repairs to plumbing at the leased premises. The plaintiffs assert that the roof, gutter, and main sewer line and drains are public areas for which the landlord is responsible pursuant to the terms of the lease. The landlord moved for summary judgment, contending that it was the tenants' responsibility to take care of the leasehold plumbing, that the plaintiffs hired the plumbing company, and that she had nothing to do with the flooding which occurred.

To establish a prima facie case of negligence, the plaintiffs must demonstrate (1) that the defendant owed them a duty of reasonable care, (2) a breach of that duty, and (3) a resulting injury proximately caused by the breach (see, Solomon v. City of New York, 66 N.Y.2d 1026; Farrar v. Teicholz, 173 A.D.2d 674). An owner of realty owes a duty to maintain the property in a reasonably safe condition (see, Macey v. Truman, 70 N.Y.2d 918, 919; Basso v. Miller, 40 N.Y.2d 233, 241). Contrary to the landlord's contention, we conclude that the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion for summary judgment (see, Negri v. Stop Shop, 65 N.Y.2d 625) demonstrates an issue of fact as to whether the landlord's alleged failure to properly maintain the roof, gutter, and main sewer line and drains contributed to the flooding of the leased premises.

Miller, J.P., Thompson, Friedmann and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

J. Rosen Furs, Inc. v. Sigma Plumbing & Heating Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 1998
249 A.D.2d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

J. Rosen Furs, Inc. v. Sigma Plumbing & Heating Corp.

Case Details

Full title:J. ROSEN FURS, INC., et al., Respondents, v. SIGMA PLUMBING HEATING CORP.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 6, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 276 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 596

Citing Cases

Sheryll v. L J Hairstylists of Plainview

Contrary to the defendant's contentions, the Supreme Court properly denied its motion for summary judgment.…

Palermo v. Town of Oyster Bay

A reasonable safe condition takes in all circumstances including the purpose of the person's presence on the…