From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Alekov

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division
Oct 18, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-363-FtM-29SPC (M.D. Fla. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cv-363-FtM-29SPC.

October 18, 2011


ORDER


This matter comes before the Court on the Plaintiff, J J Sports Productions, Inc.'s Motion for Entry of Clerk's Default against the Defendants Kristian V. Alekov, Tiffany J. Alekov, and WM Enterprises, d/b/a Ultra Naples (Doc. #14) filed on October 13, 2011. Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a), default is justified "[w]hen a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise appear by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk shall enter the party's default."

The Plaintiff moves for a Clerk's Default against the Defendants, Kristian Alekov, Tiffany J. Alekov, and WM Enterprises, d/b/a Ultra Naples, d/b/a Ultra Nightclub. The Plaintiff filed a Return of Service for each Defendants (Docs. # 8, 9, 10). However, upon review of the Returns, the Court cannot determine that service in this instance was effectual. Each Return states "I Edwin Cintron being duly sworn, depose and say that on the 30th day of August, 2011 at 6:30pm, I: individually served the within named person with a true copy of this summons, complaint. . . ." Cintron also stated that "after numerous attempts a neighbor at 9669 Blue Stone Circle, ultimately confirmed that the Defendant is out of town until the end of August on vacation. Gate guard confirms the Defendant has not been seen in a while."

Generally, a return has the name of the individual served inserted into the Return where the Plaintiff merely states ". . . individually served the within named person. . . ." As an example, the Plaintiff filed an unexecuted Return of Service (Doc. # 7) on August 8, 2011. In the unexecuted Return of Service, the Plaintiff states plainly that service could not be executed on David P. Edenfield rather than stating service could not be executed on the within named person.

The information provided by the Plaintiff in the Returns is therefore somewhat contradictory and does not provided the Court with a clear statement that service was effective on each of the named Defendants. Thus, based upon the evidence presented to the Court, it cannot be determined and in fact appears that service in the case was ineffectual. Therefore, the Motion for a Clerk's Default is due to be denied.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

The Plaintiff, J J Sports Productions, Inc.'s Motion for Entry of Clerk's Default against the Defendants Kristian V. Alekov, Tiffany J. Alekov, and WM Enterprises, d/b/a Ultra Naples (Doc. #14) is DENIED. The Plaintiff is given leave to file a new motion for Clerk's Default after properly filled out returns are filed with the Court.

DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida.


Summaries of

J J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Alekov

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division
Oct 18, 2011
Case No. 2:11-cv-363-FtM-29SPC (M.D. Fla. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

J J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Alekov

Case Details

Full title:J J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., as Broadcast Licensee of the November 13…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cv-363-FtM-29SPC (M.D. Fla. Oct. 18, 2011)