J J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Cubides

4 Citing cases

  1. J&J Sports Prods., Inc. v. Bath

    CASE NO. CV F 11-1564 LJO SAB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2013)   Cited 1 times

    The "difficulty in detecting unlawful interception, the widespread problem of piracy, the projected loss to plaintiff, and the need for an award sufficient to deter future piracy by defendants and others, weigh in favor of granting maximum statutory damages." J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Cubides, 2008 WL 2756401, *2 (S.D. Tex. 2008). J & J points to the absence of a Ninth Circuit formula to calculate section 605 damages to invoke this Court's "considerable discretion.

  2. Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Garcia

    CASE NO. CV F 11-2030 LJO SAB (E.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2013)

    The "difficulty in detecting unlawful interception, the widespread problem of piracy, the projected loss to plaintiff, and the need for an award sufficient to deter future piracy by defendants and others, weigh in favor of granting maximum statutory damages." J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Cubides, 2008 WL 2756401, *2 (S.D. Tex. 2008). Joe Hand points to the absence of a Ninth Circuit formula to calculate section 605 damages to invoke this Court's "considerable discretion.

  3. J & J Sports Prods., Inc. v. De La Cerda

    CASE NO. CV F 11-1896 LJO SKO (E.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2013)   Cited 5 times
    Noting that defendants are strictly liable under ยง 553 for actual or statutory damages

    The "difficulty in detecting unlawful interception, the widespread problem of piracy, the projected loss to plaintiff, and the need for an award sufficient to deter future piracy by defendants and others, weigh in favor of granting maximum statutory damages." J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Cubides, 2008 WL 2756401, *2 (S.D. Tex. 2008). J & J points to the absence of a Ninth Circuit formula to calculate section 605 damages to invoke this Court's "considerable discretion.

  4. J J Sports Prod. v. Live Oak Co. Post No. 6119

    CIVIL ACTION NO. C-08-270 (S.D. Tex. Sep. 8, 2009)

    Moreover, the award of attorney's fees in this case is consistent with awards in other Communications Act cases in this District. See, e.g., J J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Cubides, No. H-08-608, 2008 WL 2756401 (S.D. Tex. July 15, 2008) ($1,000 in attorney's fees); J J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Rubio, No. H-08-1770, 2008 WL 4360883 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 24, 2008) ($716.25 in attorney's fees); DirecTV, Inc. v. Estrada, No. L-03-cv-136, 2005 WL 2372066 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 26, 2005) ($5,187.