From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J & J Sports Prods. v. Enriquez

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Sep 21, 2021
19-CV-2384 (EK) (CLP) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 21, 2021)

Opinion

19-CV-2384 (EK) (CLP)

09-21-2021

J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MARCELINO ENRIQUEZ, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM & ORDER

ERIC KOMITEE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has received Magistrate Judge Pollak's Report and Recommendation (R&R) dated July 16, 2021. ECF No. 18. Judge Pollak recommends granting Plaintiff's motion for attorneys' fees and costs in part and denying it in part. Specifically, she recommends awarding Plaintiff $573.00 for the costs of filing and service of process, but denying Plaintiff's requests for attorneys' fees and investigative costs. Neither party has filed objections and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error on the face of the record. See Advisory Comm. Notes to Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); accord State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Grafman, 968 F.Supp.2d 480, 481 (E.D.N.Y. 2013). Having reviewed the record, the Court finds no clear error. The Court therefore adopts the R&R in its entirety pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Plaintiff is awarded Plaintiff $573.00 in costs. Plaintiff's requests for attorneys' fees and investigative costs are denied.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

J & J Sports Prods. v. Enriquez

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Sep 21, 2021
19-CV-2384 (EK) (CLP) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 21, 2021)
Case details for

J & J Sports Prods. v. Enriquez

Case Details

Full title:J&J SPORTS PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MARCELINO ENRIQUEZ, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Sep 21, 2021

Citations

19-CV-2384 (EK) (CLP) (E.D.N.Y. Sep. 21, 2021)