From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

IVY v. WRIGLEY

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 11, 2008
1:07-cv-00801-LJO-WMW (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2008)

Opinion

1:07-cv-00801-LJO-WMW (HC).

February 11, 2008


ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE TRAVERSE (DOCUMENT #11) THIRTY DAY DEADLINE


Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On January 17, 2008, Petitioner filed a motion for a ninety (90) day extension of time. Petitioner did not indicate what the request for extension of time was for, however, pending and due before the court is the Petitioner's traverse. Petitioner also does not explain why he cannot produce his traverse at the institution at which he is now located. Under these circumstances, the court declines to grant Petitioner more than thirty days extension at a time.

Accordingly, Petitioner is HEREBY GRANTED thirty days from the date of service of this order in which to file a traverse to the answer.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

IVY v. WRIGLEY

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 11, 2008
1:07-cv-00801-LJO-WMW (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2008)
Case details for

IVY v. WRIGLEY

Case Details

Full title:JOHN IVY, Petitioner, v. JEFFREY WRIGLEY, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 11, 2008

Citations

1:07-cv-00801-LJO-WMW (HC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2008)