From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ivory v. Governor Robert Bentley

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Jun 2, 2011
CA 11-0135-KD-C (S.D. Ala. Jun. 2, 2011)

Opinion

CA 11-0135-KD-C.

June 2, 2011


ORDER


The named defendants have filed a document entitled conflict disclosure statement (Doc. 18) in accordance with Local Rule 3.4. The undersigned would simply note that the filing of this statement was unnecessary since the named defendants are not a corporation, association, joint venture, partnership, syndicate, or other similar entity ( compare id. at 1 (defendants' Bentley, Thomas, and Strange identify themselves as individuals and/or government entities) with SD ALA LR 3.4(a) ("A corporation, association, joint venture, partnership, syndicate, or other similar entity appearing as a party or amicus in any proceeding shall file a Disclosure Statement, at the time of the filing of the initial pleading, or other court paper on behalf of that party or as otherwise ordered by the court, identifying all parent companies, subsidiaries, and affiliates that have issued shares or debt securities to the public.")).

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ivory v. Governor Robert Bentley

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Jun 2, 2011
CA 11-0135-KD-C (S.D. Ala. Jun. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Ivory v. Governor Robert Bentley

Case Details

Full title:SAMUEL EARL IVORY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GOVERNOR ROBERT BENTLEY, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Jun 2, 2011

Citations

CA 11-0135-KD-C (S.D. Ala. Jun. 2, 2011)