From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

IVOR v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jan 29, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02899-RPM (D. Colo. Jan. 29, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02899-RPM.

January 29, 2010


ORDER MODIFYING RULE 16 PROCEDURE — ERISA


Because this is an action brought under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), no scheduling conference under Fed.R.Civ.P. 16(b) and D.C.COLO. LCivR 16.1 is necessary. As an alternative, it is

ORDERED:

That on or before March 1, 2010, counsel for the parties shall file a joint statement addressing the following matters:

1. Whether the parties agree upon the contents of the administrative record.
2. Whether the parties agree upon the standard of review. If there is a disagreement, state the parties' positions.
3. Whether any discovery is necessary. If so, provide a statement of what discovery is sought and why it is necessary.
4. Whether there is any reason to proceed in any manner other than to establish a briefing schedule based on the administrative record.
5. Whether the parties are in agreement that the submission of the entire administrative record is not necessary, understanding that those portions relied upon will be submitted as appendices to the briefs.
6. The dates for the filing of briefs addressing the issues.

If there is disagreement on any of these matters, the Court will set a conference to resolve the disputes.


Summaries of

IVOR v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jan 29, 2010
Civil Action No. 09-cv-02899-RPM (D. Colo. Jan. 29, 2010)
Case details for

IVOR v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

Case Details

Full title:FAWN MAC IVOR, Plaintiff, v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA and…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jan 29, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02899-RPM (D. Colo. Jan. 29, 2010)