From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ivleva v. Kane

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jan 4, 2009
CV 08-1506-PHX-PGR (JRI) (D. Ariz. Jan. 4, 2009)

Opinion

CV 08-1506-PHX-PGR (JRI).

January 4, 2009


ORDER


The Court having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Irwin and no party having filed any objection to the Report and Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by the Court.

The Magistrate Judge found that Petitioner received adequate warning of the consequences of failing to keep the Court apprised of her address. Petitioner's failure to keep the Court informed of her new address constitutes failure to prosecute. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-631 (1962). Magistrate Judge Irwin determined that in light of Petitioner's refusal to respond to the Court, less onerous sanctions would be ineffective; however, a dismissal with prejudice would be unnecessarily harsh. This Court agrees.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED and DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute.


Summaries of

Ivleva v. Kane

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jan 4, 2009
CV 08-1506-PHX-PGR (JRI) (D. Ariz. Jan. 4, 2009)
Case details for

Ivleva v. Kane

Case Details

Full title:Anna Viktorovna Ivleva, Petitioner, v. Katrina Kane, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jan 4, 2009

Citations

CV 08-1506-PHX-PGR (JRI) (D. Ariz. Jan. 4, 2009)