From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ivey v. Williams

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
May 24, 2021
No. 20-2405 (8th Cir. May. 24, 2021)

Opinion

No. 20-2405

05-24-2021

Christopher Ivey Plaintiff - Appellant v. Daniel Williams; Michael Glavan; William Gullickson; Scott Giannini; Tara Halverson; Kevin Dreher; Matthew Dahl Defendants - Appellees


Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota [Unpublished] Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Christopher Ivey appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful de novo review, we conclude that summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Banks v. John Deere & Co., 829 F.3d 661, 665 (8th Cir. 2016) (stating that the grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo, viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the non-movant and giving him the benefit of all reasonable inferences that can be drawn from the record). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

The Honorable Donovan W. Frank, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Tony N. Leung, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota. --------


Summaries of

Ivey v. Williams

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
May 24, 2021
No. 20-2405 (8th Cir. May. 24, 2021)
Case details for

Ivey v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:Christopher Ivey Plaintiff - Appellant v. Daniel Williams; Michael Glavan…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: May 24, 2021

Citations

No. 20-2405 (8th Cir. May. 24, 2021)