From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ives v. Central Union Trust Co.

Supreme Court, Queens Special Term
Jun 1, 1919
110 Misc. 740 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1919)

Opinion

June, 1919.

George H. Minor, for plaintiff.

N. Otis Rockwood, for defendants Montgomery and others.

Miller, King, Lane Trafford, for defendant Central Union Trust Co.

Steele, De Friese Steele, for defendants Charles H. Ives and others.


The apparent intention of the testator was to provide an income for each of his brothers during their respective lives, and after the termination of the trust the principal should go to his sister. The fact that one brother died previous to the testator offered no reason for rendering that expressed intention nugatory. The gift over to the sister, so far as it came through or by way of the deceased brother, became vested immediately upon the death of the testator subject only to the payment of the income that would have gone to the deceased brother if he had lived, to the survivor. The possibility of the death of either brother before the testator's death was contemplated by the testator, was provided for in his will and was anticipated to such an extent, at least, that no further testamentary disposition, in so far as the death of either brother before the testator was concerned, was deemed necessary. Judgment is directed for the plaintiff.

Judgment for plaintiff.


Summaries of

Ives v. Central Union Trust Co.

Supreme Court, Queens Special Term
Jun 1, 1919
110 Misc. 740 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1919)
Case details for

Ives v. Central Union Trust Co.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN FRANCIS IVES, Plaintiff, v . CENTRAL UNION TRUST COMPANY et al.…

Court:Supreme Court, Queens Special Term

Date published: Jun 1, 1919

Citations

110 Misc. 740 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1919)
180 N.Y.S. 343