From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Iverson v. Jones

Supreme Court of California
Jan 26, 1885
2 Cal. Unrep. 437 (Cal. 1885)

Opinion

          Department 2. Appeals from the superior court of Mendocino county.

          APPEAL— TIME FOR FILING UNDERTAKING.

         An undertaking on appeal filed more than a month before the notice of appeal is filed, is no undertaking at all, and an appeal based thereon must be dismissed.

         COUNSEL

         J. T. Rogers, for appellant.

         T. J. Carothers, for respondent.


          OPINION

         THE COURT.

          The court is of opinion that the appeals in these cases must be dismissed. The undertakings on appeal were filed more than a month before the notices of appeal were filed. This, in our view, is not the undertaking required by law. It is not the case of insufficiency in the undertaking, but it is no undertaking at all. The motions to dismiss must be granted; and it is so ordered.


Summaries of

Iverson v. Jones

Supreme Court of California
Jan 26, 1885
2 Cal. Unrep. 437 (Cal. 1885)
Case details for

Iverson v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:IVERSON v. JONES.

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Jan 26, 1885

Citations

2 Cal. Unrep. 437 (Cal. 1885)
2 Cal. Unrep. 437