From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ivanovic v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 14, 2014
139 So. 3d 886 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC13–1000.

2014-04-14

Barney IVANOVIC, et al., Petitioner(s) v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., etc., Respondent(s).


Because petitioners have failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, they are not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla.2000).

PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and LABARGA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Ivanovic v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Supreme Court of Florida.
Apr 14, 2014
139 So. 3d 886 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

Ivanovic v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Case Details

Full title:Barney IVANOVIC, et al., Petitioner(s) v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., etc.…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Apr 14, 2014

Citations

139 So. 3d 886 (Fla. 2014)