Opinion
No. 113495(40).
February 29, 2000.
On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of November 2, 1999 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
CAVANAGH and KELLY, JJ., would grant the motion for reconsideration, and on reconsideration would grant leave to appeal.