Opinion
June 16, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Eugene Nardelli, J.).
The lease in question unambiguously provides for arbitration of the instant dispute concerning the valuation of land. We will not interfere with the arbitrator's broad authority to resolve the dispute (see, Matter of 166 Mamaroneck Ave. Corp. v. 151 E. Post Rd. Corp., 78 N.Y.2d 88). Moreover, the arbitrators here are uniquely qualified professionals highly competent in the area of land valuation.
We decline the invitation to address the issue of prejudgment interest. The issue is premature.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Kassal and Smith, JJ.