From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Iszaz v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 17, 2015
No. 69160 (Nev. Dec. 17, 2015)

Opinion

No. 69160

12-17-2015

RIGOBERTO ENRIQUE ISZAZ, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

cc: Rigoberto Enrique Iszaz Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus in which petitioner challenges the validity of his judgment of conviction and seeks immediate release from custody. We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter, and without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRS 34.160; NRS 34.170. A challenge to the validity of the judgment of conviction must be raised in a post-conviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed in the district court in the first instance. NRS 34.724(2)(b); NRS 34.738(1). Accordingly, we

We express no opinion as to whether petitioner could meet the procedural requirements of NRS chapter 34. --------

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, J.

Saitta /s/_________, J.
Gibbons /s/_________, J.
Pickering cc: Rigoberto Enrique Iszaz

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Iszaz v. State

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Dec 17, 2015
No. 69160 (Nev. Dec. 17, 2015)
Case details for

Iszaz v. State

Case Details

Full title:RIGOBERTO ENRIQUE ISZAZ, Petitioner, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Dec 17, 2015

Citations

No. 69160 (Nev. Dec. 17, 2015)