From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Iswed v. Caruso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 10, 2012
No. 1:08-cv-1118 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 10, 2012)

Opinion

No. 1:08-cv-1118

12-10-2012

BAHAA E. ISWED, #272102, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA CARUSO, MARY BERGHUIS, WRIGHT WADE, and G. RILEY, Defendants.


HONORABLE PAUL L. MALONEY


JUDGMENT

Having resolved all pending claims, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58, JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants in their official capacity.

Defendants are hereby ORDERED to allow Plaintiff Iswed, beginning no later than 56 days from this date, to make telephone calls to family members in Jordan and Romania in the same manner as other inmates are allowed to make domestic telephone calls. Plaintiff shall bear the toll costs associated with connectivity between his place of incarceration and the phone numbers in Jordan and Romania for each call he places. This injunction shall expire one year from the date of this order. However, Plaintiff may seek extension of the injunction if circumstances continue to justify the same. Defendants may oppose an extension on any ground pertinent to the then-existing circumstances.

Plaintiff shall submit a bill of costs, with supporting documentation as necessary, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) and Rule 54.1 of the Local Civil Rules of the Western District of Michigan.

THIS ACTION IS TERMINATED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

Paul L. Maloney

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Iswed v. Caruso

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Dec 10, 2012
No. 1:08-cv-1118 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Iswed v. Caruso

Case Details

Full title:BAHAA E. ISWED, #272102, Plaintiff, v. PATRICIA CARUSO, MARY BERGHUIS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 10, 2012

Citations

No. 1:08-cv-1118 (W.D. Mich. Dec. 10, 2012)