Opinion
June 20, 1991
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Peter Tom, J.).
There was no abuse of discretion in permitting petitioner leave to pursue limited discovery in this judgment enforcement proceeding, where it is not conclusively demonstrated the two transactions were immune from attack as fraudulent conveyances (Debtor and Creditor Law art 10; see, Foremost Ins. Co. v Facultative Group, 80 A.D.2d 598, 599).
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Ross, Kassal and Rubin, JJ.